Essay --

When we analyze a work, it is easy to judge the characters by the standards of our time, but this is not very fair to them. They do not follow our rules; they follow the standards of their societies. In addition, unless the characters’ thoughts are revealed to us in soliloquies or asides, we cannot tell if the person knows of his or her actions’ consequences. To determine if a character is â€Å"good† or â€Å"bad,† we must set a standard and evaluate it for each text we examine. We shall define â€Å"goodness† as performing actions whose outcomes are net positive, intended or not, and â€Å"badness† as the opposite. Through this lens we shall examine King Claudius of Hamlet, discovering that while Claudius might be a good King, he is definitely not a good person. When we first meet Claudius, he is holding court and giving a very long and eloquent speech with frequent use of the â€Å"royal we.† He begins by unifying himself with the audience in grief over â€Å"our dear brother’s death† (1.2.1) and then explains he will marry Queen Gertrude to both solidify his rule and bring â€Å"mirth to funeral† (1.2.12). However, it is odd that King Hamlet’s son, Hamlet, did not inherit the throne. Claudius explains, referring to his near marriage, that the nobles â€Å"have freely gone / With this affair along† (1.2.15-6), so it is likely that he convinced the nobles to vote for him as King instead of Hamlet, who was away. Instead of taking the crown by force, which Laertes and Fortinbras will later attempt, Claudius became King without any harm whatsoever, excepting the murder of King Hamlet. His ease with the royal court and the trust he places in the nobles are signs of his good Kingship, however much hidden blood there may be. Claudius is not just friendly with the nobles. ... ...m; the poisoned goblet makes Hamlet realize Claudius’s plan and results in Hamlet killing him with the same goblet. Although we quickly see through Claudius’s sham, his â€Å"bad† qualities might be the reason for his â€Å"good† Kingship. After all, a King who is ambitious, manipulative, and selfish would want to keep the throne, and since Claudius dislikes confrontation, he has evidently decided to remain in power by being a just and wise ruler. He might have had the wrong motivations and a terrible character, but royal policies were, on the whole, good for Denmark. But we must not forget his terrible choice; instead of giving up his sins’ rewards, he chooses to keep them and kill Hamlet to assure his crown. Make no mistake, Claudius was a bad person, but Denmark had experienced an extraordinary King, ended with poisoned drink in his throat and poisoned sword in his chest.

Bottlenecks in a Process Essay

Bottleneck can slow down production and diminish efficiency. According to Li, Chang, & Ni, (2009) â€Å"quick and correct identification of the bottleneck locations can lead to an improvement in the operation management of utilizing finite manufacturing resources, increasing the system throughput, and minimizing the total cost of production† (p.1). The operation of preparing dinner will be analysis to find where the process has a bottleneck and how to eliminate or reduce the bottleneck time. Identifying the Bottleneck in the Process When preparing dinner marinating the meat has proven to be a bottleneck for the process. For example steak can require up to 24 hours to be marinated, holding production for 24 hours is a problem. Choosing a different cut of meat can reduce the time and can require as little as one hour for the meat to marinate. In the production of preparing dinner an hour is still a bottleneck in the process. Considering it can be one hour to marinate the meat, then twenty minutes to cook while side dishes such as rice will only take about thirty minutes to cook the two process can not be run parallel on product will be undercook while the other overcook. Data Collection Reviewing the data collected over the last four week in preparing dinner the cycle of the process is longer when meat requiring longer marinating time is used in the preparation of dinner. During week two on the second day the preparation of dinner took sixty minutes. The marinating of the meat prevented the process of the side dish to begin because it would cause the meal to be overcooked. The key is to schedule the process capacity carefully to ensure the bottleneck is eliminate or reduce. One step taken to reduce the bottleneck time to make long-term decision regarding the process and have the meat marinates overnight. Avoiding last minute decision increases the efficiently in the process time. Conclusion According to Kamauff, (2010) †bottleneck-point in a process where the flow slows and work-in-process accumulates because of a difference between capacity of one process and the demand of the next†(p.32). Identifying the bottleneck can help plan the process more efficient to reduce the waste of resource such as time. Preparing dinner can be time consuming but with long-term planning and decision making improvements can be made to the process to reduce time. The extra time can be utilize do spend more time with the family reviewing the day.

Michael Porters Strategy

Michael Porters Strategy Michael Porter is the University Professor (the highest honor in Harvard University) in Harvard Business School. He is acknowledged as the father of competitive strategy. He has two main theoretical perspectives; one is â€Å"the five forces model of competition†, and the other one is just the â€Å"three competition strategies† (Michael Porters Strategy). The three competition strategies are cost leadership strategy, differentiation strategy and segmentation strategy. These strategies are used for people to achieve, maintain and even increase their competitiveness of their business.Porter thought that the purpose of these strategies is to make the business of the enterprises better than their competitors: some of the enterprises can gain higher revenue in some industries; however, in some other industries, the success of one of the strategies may just give the enterprise a little bit profit. Porter also said that the possibility could be very l ow that the basic goal of an enterprise may be more than one. Because enterprises need to try their best to achieve one strategy and they also need organizational arrangement to support the strategy.If the enterprise has more than one goal, these resources will be dispersed. Cost leadership strategy. This strategy asks the enterprises to establish efficient production line, decrease the cost on the basis of their experience, and control the cost of management and production cost, so as to reduce the costs of R&D (research and development), service, marketing, advertising, etc. In order to reach these goals, management need to be highly concentrated. If the enterprise has low cost, it means that this enterprise can earn more value when other enterprises lose profit in competition.Enterprises need to obtain high relative market share or other strength, such as good communication with raw material suppliers, to get the good status of the lowest total cost. This status is very attractiv e; because once an enterprise wins the status, they can get higher marginal profit, as well as invest to new equipment and modern equipment to keep their leading position of cost. This kind of re-invest is the precondition of keeping the condition of low cost. Differentiation strategy. Differentiation strategy is to make the products or service differently to make them special.There are many ways to achieve this strategy: design the brand image, make technic unique, perform distinctive, provide customer service, build business network and make other aspect unique. The best way is that the enterprise has many differentiation characters. If this strategy implemented well, it can make the enterprise get high level of profit. Porter thought that building differentiation strategy means that the enterprise needs to think clearly because of the exclusiveness of it. The strategy cannot stay with increasing market share.Enterprises need to spend high cost when establishing this strategy. Tho ugh clients know clearly about the special strength of the enterprise, they may not have the ability or they are not willing to pay for the high cost the enterprises asked them to pay. Segmentation strategy. This strategy focuses on a special client group, or a small area of the production line or a special market. Segmentation strategy focuses on better service a special target, while the other two strategies focus on the whole industry.The precondition of this strategy is that the business of the enterprise can provide better service and higher efficiency to its special strategic target, so as to exceed other competitors in broader area. Porter said that this strategy could both achieve differentiation and low cost. However, this strategy means that the market share is limited. Segmentation strategy cannot increase both profit rate and the amount of sales. Porter indicated that enterprises need to make sure about the three strategies and they should make a fundamental strategic de cision to close up to the three strategies, but not hesitate at the crosswords.Once the enterprise does not make the decision, they will spend much money and time. Using these strategies one by one will be failed, cause the requirement of them are totally different. Baike, 2013, â€Å"Michael Porter†, Biaduoedia, viewed at March 12th 2013, Wiki, 2013, â€Å"Porter’s generic etrategy†, wiki article, viewed at March 12th 2013,

Tropical Rainforests - Harbors of Diversity

Tropical Rainforests - Harbors of Diversity Biodiversity is a term biologists and ecologists use to describe natural biotic variety. The numbers of animal and plant species plus the richness of gene pools and living ecosystems all make for sustained, healthy, and diverse ecosystems. Plants, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, invertebrates, bacteria, and fungi all live together with non-living elements like soil, water, and air to make a functioning ecosystem. A healthy tropical rainforest is the worlds most spectacular example of a living, functioning ecosystem and the ultimate example of biodiversity. Just How Diverse are Tropical Rainforests? Rainforests have been around a long time, even on a geological scale. Some existing rainforests have evolved over 65 million years. This time-enhanced stability has in the past allowed these forests greater opportunities for biological perfection. Future tropical rainforest stability is now not so certain as human populations have exploded, rainforest products are in demand, and countries struggle to balance the environmental issues with the needs of citizens living off these products. Rainforests by their very nature harbor the greatest biological gene pool in the world. The gene is a basic building block of living things and every species is evolved by various combinations of these blocks. The tropical rainforest has nurtured this pool for millions of years to become the exclusive home for 170,000 of the worlds 250,000 known plant species. What Is Tropical Rainforest Biodiversity? Tropical rainforests support higher land area units (acres or hectares) of biodiversity when compared to temperate or arid forest ecosystems. There are some educated guesses by experts that tropical rainforests on our planet contain about 50% of the world’s terrestrial plant and animal species. The most common estimate of the size of total rainforests amount to approximately 6% of the world’s land area.   While tropical rainforests around the world have many similarities in their climates and soil composition, each regional rainforest is unique. You will not find precisely the same species living in all the tropical rainforests around the world. For example, the species in African tropical rainforests are not the same as the species living in the tropical rainforests of Central America. However, the different species play similar roles within their specific regional rainforest. Biodiversity can be measured on three levels. The National Wildlife Federation lists these levers as:1) Species diversity - being  the sheer variety of living things, from microscopic bacteria and fungi to towering redwoods and enormous blue whales.  2)  Ecosystem diversity  - being tropical rainforests, deserts, swamps, tundra, and everything in between.  3)  Genetic diversity  - being the variety of genes within a single species, which give rise to the variations that cause species to evolve and adapt over time. Two Fantastic Rainforest/Temperate Forest Comparisons To comprehend just how marvelous this biodiversity is, you have to make a comparison or two: One study in a Brazilian rainforest found 487 tree species growing on a single hectare (2.5 acres), while the US and Canada combined only have 700 species on millions of acres.There are approximately 320 butterfly species in all of Europe. Just one park in a Peruvian rainforest, The Manu National Park, has 1300 species. Top Biodiverse Rainforest Countries: According to Rhett Butler at Mongabay.com, the following ten countries are home to the most biodiverse tropical rainforests on Earth. The United States is included only because of Hawaiis protected forests. The countries in order of diversity are: BrazilColombiaIndonesiaChinaMexicoSouth AfricaVenezuelaEcuadorPeruUnited States

How the State Profits from War Essays

How the State Profits from War Essays How the State Profits from War Essay How the State Profits from War Essay One of the most abiding misconceptions in economic science is that war is good to the economic system ( Moffatt. n. pag. ) . This myth was farther perpetuated by the economic expert and New York Times editorialist Paul Krugman. who wrote: Ghastly as it may look. ( the devastation of the World Trade Center ) could even make some economic good†¦ the drive force behind the economic lag has been a dip in concern investing. Now. all of a sudden. we need some new office buildings ( Tracinski. n. pag. ) . Indeed. bad economic sciences reign in minutes of crisis and or terror. when people are despairing for solutions. To rebut the alleged benefits of the War Economy. reviews use the fallacy of the broken window ( Tracinski. n. pag. ) . When a vandal throws a brick through a shop’s window and the shop’s proprietor has to pass. state. $ 200 for the window’s fix. the people will believe that the defacer has given a positive part to society. After all. the fix of the broken window meant an instant encouragement in employment and economic activity ( Tracinski. n. pag. ) . But what these short-sighted citizens didn’t know was that the $ 200 that was spent on repairing the window could hold been used in ventures that might hold advanced the store owner’s endeavor. Unfortunately. advocates of the War Economy assumed that ( since ) a broken window can excite the economic system. ( it must be better ) when literally 1000s of them are broken ( Tracinski. n. pag. ) . For them. wars are important for the endurance of modern economic systems ( Cline. n. pag. ) . War Economy advocates believed that about every industry is involved with supplying goods and services to the armed forces ( uniforms. nutrient. medical specialties. arms fabricating. etc. ) . Hence. should war be eliminated. these concerns. peculiarly engineering and fabrication. will turn up up. Another statement of the angels of the War Economy is that it is the fastest solution to an economic slack ( Moffatt. n. pag. ) . When the economic system is undergoing recession. production is low and people are passing less than usual. But when the authorities goes into war. it will necessitate arms and equipment for its soldiers. Economic activity is hence expected to increase due to the rise both in authorities disbursement and the private sector’s concern minutess with the miliatry. Corporations will scramble for contracts that will let them to provide uniforms. vehicles and bombs to the ground forces. These companies will hold to engage more workers to maintain up with the addition in demand. take downing the unemployment rate in the procedure. There are even some workers who will be employed to replace those who volunteered as reservists abroad. Since the unemployment rate is decreased. consumers will pass more once more. Increased ingestion. in bend. will hike the retail sector. At the terminal of the twenty-four hours. there will be overall economic growing. thanks to the authorities fixing for war. However. critics contended that the above-named jutting economic promotion is at the disbursal of incapacitated civilians from Third World states ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . In 2002. one-year planetary military outgos were estimated to be more than $ 800 billion ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . The United States was at the top of this list. passing $ 343. 2 billion annually ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . Canada earned more than $ 3 million from selling arms in the same twelvemonth ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . Harmonizing to the United Nations Platform for Action Committee – Manitoba ( UNPAC-Manitoba ) article The Economicss of War ( n. d. ) . a big portion of the economic systems of all of the world’s wealthiest states derives from the sale of weapons ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . From 1996 to 2000. the US exported $ 54 billion worth of weaponries – 45 % of the entire sum of arms that was exported around the universe ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . Russia came 2nd at $ 21 billion ( 17 % ) . followed by France ( $ 11 billion or 9 % ) . the United Kingdom ( $ 8 billion or 7 % ) and Germany ( $ 6 billion or 5 % ) ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . As a consequence. says the United Nations Development Program ( UNDP ) in 2002. 500. 000 firearm-related deceases occur yearly ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . Each twelvemonth. land mines kill 15. 000-20. 000 kids and grownups ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . Iraq’s malignant neoplastic disease rates rose to 700 % between 1991 and 1994 due to chemical arms. while 86 million people have perished in belligerencies after World War II ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. unpac. ca. n. pag. ) . The Iraq war in 2003 was the latest illustration of how the US turned war into a money-making venture. It was rooted in the logic of planetary monopoly capital. specifically American capitalist economy. to spread out into an empire ( Barona. 33 ) . Despite being packaged as a terrorist war. ( to transfuse fear among disparagers ) it was brought approximately by the globalisation policies of American transnational companies. peculiarly the US oil industry and the military-industrial composite ( MIC ) ( Barona. 33 ) . Iraq is one of the world’s biggest oil militias – it. along with other OPEC states such as Saudi Arabia. Iran. Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. has 79 % of the world’s entire oil supply ( __________ . 16 ) . For the US to hold limitless entree to Iraq’s oil. it merely had to take Saddam Hussein. a steadfast US opposition. from power. Back place. the US economic system was sustained by military disbursement – the injection of fresh capital was necessary to resuscitate an economic system that would go on to deteriorate if left to the free market ( Barona. 33 ) . But the Iraq war proved to be black for the US economic system. The US spends $ 200 million daily merely to be able to go on its military operations in Iraq ( Wolk. n. pag. ) . Even if the US eventually decides to draw its military personnels out of Iraq within another three old ages. entire direct and indirect costs to US taxpayers will probably by more than $ 400 billion†¦the entire economic impact at up to $ 2 trillion ( Wolk. n. pag. ) . Economist and Nobel Prize victor Joseph Stiglitz ( a well-known castigator of the Iraq war ) claimed that the entire cost of US military intercession in Iraq is a staggering $ 1 trillion to $ 2 trillion. including $ 500 billion for the war and business and up to $ 300 billion in future wellness attention costs for hurt troops ( Wolk. n. pag. ) . Stiglitz added that farther disbursals include a negative impact from the lifting cost of oil and added involvement on the national debt ( Wolk. n. pag. ) . These astronomically immense amounts of money came from revenue enhancements – financess that should hold been diverted to basic societal services such as instruction. wellness and lodging. While ordinary American citizens were enduring from the economic calamity brought approximately by the Iraq war. a few persons and corporations cahsed in on the said struggle. In 2007. Lockheed Martin ( the taking arms maker in the US ) had a net income addition of 22 % ( Scheer. n. pag. ) . In the same twelvemonth. the net incomes of its rivals Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics rose by 62 % and 22 % . severally ( Scheer. n. pag. ) . Boeing’s net incomes. meanwhile. increased by 61 % ( Scheer. n. pag. ) . Below are some personalities who were said to hold besides profitted from the Iraq War: a ) Former US President George W. Bush. Sr. – Shareholder and former Senior Advisor in the Carlyle Group. a defence contractor with ties to the Saudi royal household and the Bin Ladens. B ) Former Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci – Member of the RAND Board of Trustees and co-chair of the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy Advisory Board. Besides the president of the Carlyle Group. degree Celsius ) Former Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury James Baker – Former Carlyle Senior Counselor. vitamin D ) White House Budget Advisor Richard Darman – Carlyle Managing Director vitamin E ) US Vice President Dick Cheney – Head of Halliburton Co. . an oil endeavor that traded with Libya and Iran through foreign subordinates ( Lynch. n. pag. ) . Thankss to the craze brought approximately by the War on Terrorism and the Iraq war. taxpayers were swindled into funding the War Economy that made millionaires out of Bush and his like. And every bit long as the absurd propaganda of The War on Terrorism and the Iraq war continues to be. ordinary Americans will pass their full lives paying revenue enhancements non for basic societal services. but as a tribute to Bush and his kind for them to be able to populate like male monarchs. Plants Cited The Oil Equation in the US Bid against Iraq. Education for Development October 2002: 15-16. Barona. Caesar. Technology. Power and the War against Terrorism. The National Guilder July 2002: 32-33. Cline. Austin. Economic Benefits of War. n. d. About. com. 18 February 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //atheism. about. com/library/FAQs/phil/blphil_eth_wardef_econ. htm gt ; . Lynch. Colum. Firms Iraq Deals Greater Than Cheney Has Said. 23 June 2001. Global Policy Forum. 19 February 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. globalpolicy. org/security/sanction/iraq1/oilforfood/2001/0627chen. htm gt ; . Moffatt. Mike. Are Wars Good for the Economy? n. d. About. com 18 February 2008 lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //economics. about. com/od/warandtheeconomy/a/warsandeconomy. htm gt ; .

After Thousand Years Essays - Anaida, De, Green Leaves, Free Essays

fter thousand years naida want to believe to a memory and love, left man after him and no matter what he did no matter what he does and will do in his future , he just has to do something good for world?s sake, something important to every body who he is surrounded with, let it be a very little thing? here was a man, so he created how to write and read, he taught then children how to do it. Soon they became talented writers; there was a man, he painted pictures and in the museums people were feeling better in their hearts looking at them; there was a man, he planted a seedling, after some years it grew up a big tree and made the air cleaner. here will be a man and he will continue loving, his love will retain through the centuries and after thousand years you?ll see a tree full if green leaves, under it?s shadow will sit a painter drawing a picture on canvas of a writer with a lot of papers on his knees and many other people will be around them walking, smiling from the bottom of their hearts. You can explain a picture and you?ll see that the only name for it - is the one ? ?life is beautiful?.

Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4

Questions - Essay Example In the development of their forms of government, Egypt went straight from pre-civilization to large government units, was more centralized and authority was concentrated in a divine Pharaoh. On the other hand, Mesopotamia passed through a city-state phase, authority was more dispersed and governance was exercised through councils and participatory institutions. In form of writing, both cultures developed complex forms of writing which was monopolized by the priestly class. However, Mesopotamia developed the cuneiform alphabet while Egypt had its hieroglyphics, a more pictorial form based on simplified pictures of objects abstracted to represent concepts or sounds. Mesopotamian writing material was comprised of clay tablets and animal skins, and produced an epic literary tradition. Egypt used the papyrus formed from reeds, but used it more for record keeping (Robert Guisepi, The Origins of Civilizations, 2007). In great part, Mesopotamia developed a more advance level of science and mathematics than Egypt, although Egyptians were first to determine the length of the solar year and developed a science of medicine. Egyptian civilization was not centered on science, however, but on religion, the worship of many gods, magical rituals, and obsession with life after death (Cornelius Petrus Tiele, Comparative History of the Egyptian and Mesopotamian Religions, 1882). While their early religions developed from an awareness of nature and the environment, their attitudes differed greatly. Egypt, prosperous and harmonious and consistent with its attribution as the â€Å"gift of the Nile,† regarded their gods positively with the promise of a joyous afterlife. Mesopotamian religion was gloomy and bleak, and their prayers reflected the absence of a personal relationship with their gods and goddesses who were suspicious of humans and frequently sent calamities to underscore their humanity – as in the message of the Gilgamesh epic (Michael Streich,